dc.contributor.author | External author(s) only | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-01T16:30:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-01T16:30:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Jamie Hartmann-Boyce , Rebecca Nourse, Anne-Marie Boylan, Susan A. Jebb and Paul Aveyard. Experiences of Reframing during Self-Directed Weight Loss and Weight Loss Maintenance: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY: HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2018, 10 (2), 309–329 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1758-0854 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/234 | |
dc.description | This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Reframing means changing the way that a person thinks or feels
about a weight loss attempt or weight loss maintenance to enhance its experience
or facilitate its success. Although participants have described this, it has not been
explored in the academic literature. Here, we set out to systematically review qualitative
studies to examine the ways in which people use and experience reframing
in self-directed weight loss. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched
to January 2017 for qualitative studies of adults with overweight or obesity
attempting to lose weight or maintain weight loss through self-directed behavior
change. Studies must have contained some information pertinent to reframing. Thematic
synthesis was used to identify descriptive and analytical themes from the
available data. Results: We included 23 studies, representing 723 participants. No
study focused specifically on reframing. Most studies involved people who had
tried to lose weight previously. In the most common examples of reframing, participants
spoke of construing previous weight management attempts as “dieting”,
whereas in current attempts they used reframing to move away from this concept.
Participants spoke of finding reframing helpful because it removed the sense of
depriving themselves and instead allowed them to construe the food choices as
healthful. Likewise, the language of dieting created a sense of temporary effort,
while construing this as a way of life allowed continuation of conscious control
over energy balance without the feeling of undue effort. In some cases, these
changes were bolstered by change in self-identity. Conclusions: Some people
construe deliberate weight loss as a form of deprivation and cognitively reframe to
avoid the negative emotions this creates and to prevent relapse. Reframing the dietary
regimen as about healthy eating and a new way of life made weight control
seem less burdensome for these participants and they felt able to maintain their
efforts. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Supported by the NIHR | en |
dc.description.uri | https:// doi: 10.1111/aphw.12132s | |
dc.description.uri | https:// doi: 10.1111/aphw.12132s | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Weight Loss | en |
dc.title | Experiences of Reframing during Self-Directed Weight Loss and Weight Loss Maintenance: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies | en |
dc.type | Article | en |