dc.description.abstract | Objectives We aimed to evaluate test usage and patient
and clinician experience following the introduction of
point-of- care (POC) blood tests into a primary care out-of-
hours service.
Design A mixed methods service evaluation comprising
quantitative records of the clinical contexts of tests taken
and qualitative interviews with clinicians. Research
permissions and governance were obtained for patient
interviews.
Setting Out-of-
hours
primary care.
Participants All patients requiring home visits from the
service during the implementation period.
Interventions The i-STAT
POC blood test platform was
introduced to two bases providing home visits for a period
of 8 months. Venous blood samples were used and two
cartridges were available. The CHEM8 cartridge measures
sodium, potassium, chloride, total carbon dioxide (TCO2),
anion gap, ionised calcium, glucose, urea, creatinine,
haematocrit and haemoglobin. The CG4 cartridge
measures lactate, pH, PaO2 and PCO2, TCO2, bicarbonate,
base excess and oxygen saturation.
Primary and secondary outcome measures The
proportion of home visits where tests were taken,
the clinical contexts of those tests, the extent to
which clinicians felt the tests had influenced their
decisions, time taken to perform the test and problems
encountered. Clinician and patient experiences of using
POC tests.
Results i-STAT
POC tests were infrequently used, with
successful tests taken at just 47 contacts over 8 months of
implementation. The patients interviewed felt that testing
had been beneficial for their care. Clinician interviews
suggested barriers to POC tests, including practical
challenges, concerns about time, doubt over whether they
would improve clinical decision making and concern about
increased medicolegal risk. Suggestions for improving
adoption included sharing learning, adopting a whole team
approach and developing protocols for usage.
Conclusions POC tests were not successfully adopted
by an out-of-
hours home visiting service in Oxfordshire.
While some clinicians felt they could not add value, in
other cases they resulted in improved patient experience.
Adoption could be promoted by improving technical, team
and education factors. | en |