dc.contributor.author | Lasserson, Daniel S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-18T15:36:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-18T15:36:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hughes SE, Aiyegbusi OL, Lasserson DS, Philip Collis, Samantha Cruz Rivera, Christel McMullan, Grace M Turner, Jon Glasby, Melanie Calvert Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social careBMJ Open 2021;11:e045206 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/840 | |
dc.description | This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person’s own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings to support care planning, clinical decision-making, patient–practitioner communication and quality improvement. PROMs have a potential role in the delivery of social care where people often have multiple and complex long-term health conditions. However, the use of PROMs in this context is currently unclear. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the evidence relating to the use of PROMs in adult social care.
Methods and analyses The electronic databases Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Social Care Online (SCIE), Web of Science and EMBASE (Ovid) were searched on 29 September 2020 to identify eligible studies and other publically available documents published since 2010. A grey literature search and hand searching of citations and reference lists of the included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on study design or language of publication will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of the included documents will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklists. A customised data charting table will be used for data extraction, with analysis of qualitative data using the framework method. The review findings will be presented as tables and in a narrative summary. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Supported by the NIHR | en |
dc.description.uri | https:// doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) | en |
dc.title | Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care | en |
dc.type | Article | en |