dc.contributor.author | Wells, Bill | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-04T10:24:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-04T10:24:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-02-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Virginia Minogue, Bill Wells, (2018) "Adding value, reducing research waste, the role of the NHS research and development management community", International Journal of Health Governance, Vol. 23 Issue: 2, pp.160-177 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2059-4631 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/141 | |
dc.description | Published online at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHG-08-2017-0043 Eligible users can access the full text via NHS OpenAthens at [https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/IJHG-08-2017-0043] (login required). | en |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose – Research suggests that 85 per cent of health research is avoidably wasted. The research and
development management community has an important role in the research process and can contribute to
improving the quality and value of research. Al-Shahi Salman et al. (2014) identified ways in which the
community can contribute towards the reduction of research waste by increasing the efficiency of recruitment
and retention of research participants, data management and data sharing in studies, and promoting the
integration of research into practice. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach – A project undertaken between May 2016 and May 2017 explored the
perspective, and contribution, towards reducing research waste amongst the research and development
management community. The study identified those categories of research waste the community felt were the
most important and of the most value to address. It also examined spheres of influence and barriers to
addressing research waste.
Findings – The most important and highest value categories of research waste to address were:
implementation of research in practice, prioritisation of research, and design, conduct and analysis of
research. The research and development management community’s level of influence in those areas was low.
The categories where the community felt they had most influence, with the exception of design, conduct and
analysis of research, were generally those they thought were less important and valuable, i.e. research taking
place to time and target, public and patient involvement, and administration.
Originality/value – Waste in research is a significant area of waste in health care expenditure. This study
has provided a better understanding of research waste for the research management community.
The research and development management community can take a leadership role in formulating an action
plan and identifying measures of success in reducing waste in research. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Research Design | en |
dc.subject | Research Methods | en |
dc.subject | Patient Involvement | en |
dc.title | Adding value, reducing research waste, the role of the NHS research and development management community | en |
dc.type | Article | en |