| dc.contributor.author | De Giorgi, Riccardo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-01T10:21:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-01T10:21:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | De Giorgi, R. (2019). The wh-questions of network meta-analyses. BJPsych Advances, 25(6), 396-398. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/769 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Currently, network meta-analyses (NMAs) are the only technique that allow us to compare and rank numerous treatments across trials. Evidence produced by NMAs relies on pooled data from both direct and indirect comparisons within studies. Consequently, NMAs are invaluable tools for informing clinical guidelines. | en |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2019.53 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | Network Meta-Analysis | en |
| dc.title | The wh-questions of network meta-analyses | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
